When a team experiences Action Learning through a first discovery
session, the questions they ask can be a bit haphazard. It sometimes feels like
there is a competition for asking as many questions as possible. This can
frustrate the problem presenter who might think that this “great new tool” that
would help with the problem feels more like an inquisition ! And indeed, not
all questions are created equal. Team members are aware during the session what
questions are really powerful and helped the problem presenter, and which ones
were not really helping that much. So after debriefing about what they learned, they sometimes ask me “But how should we ask more of
these great questions ?”.
I prefer to
avoid any attempt to “teach” which questions are great and which questions are average.
After all, it is the person who receives the question who determines whether
that question helped to open up new thoughts, or whether it felt more like a
burden to answer. There is no such thing as “the one great question” that works
in any situation !
It is not really a matter of great questions versus average ones, but more about the extent to which the questions help the problem presenter think. I use the metaphor of an onion (see the picture) before we start the session. I explain that there is no harm in asking the questions that are at the level of the outer peel of the onion. When exploring a new issue, team members need to get basic information. These questions are useful for the team members to start to know about the problem, but they will not really help the problem presenter develop new ideas. For new ideas to be explored, team members need to try and move “towards the center of the onion”.
The team
typically gets this concept very well. In a recent session, I asked the team what they thought about the kind of questions that were asked. One team member replied “We are asking questions at
peel of the onion !”. The team immediately picked this up and confirmed that
they would have to try and move to the center of the onion if they wanted to
help the problem presenter. A similar intervention when I feel a team is asking
rather superficial questions is “Team, from the questions we have been asking
so far, have you seen the problem presenter having to think a lot or not ?”.
The metaphor of the onion comes up almost immediately.
Avoid to
teach what a great question looks like. Invite the team to think about
questions that help the problem presenter … think !